Aristotle didn't see the ontological structure of being as truth.
Truth is not a relation that is “just there” between two beings that
themselves are “just there”—one mental, the other physical. Nor is it a
coordination, as philosophers like to say these days. If it is a relation at
all, it is one that has no analogies with any other relation between beings.
If I may put it this way, it is the relation of existence as such to its
very world. It is the world-openness of existence that is itself uncovered—
existence whose very being unto the world gets disclosed/uncovered
in and with its being unto the world.
Aristotle certainly did not really see this phenomenon, in any case
not in the ontological structure that is proper to it. But even less did he
invent anything like a copy-theory of truth. Rather, he stuck to the
phenomena and understood them as broadly as possible. That is, he
avoided a fundamental error in seeing, and thus kept the road open—
only, of course, to have it thoroughly blocked again.
P. 137
No comments:
Post a Comment