enowning
Tuesday, December 14, 2004
 
In an appreciation of Quine, KC Mulville gets snippety:
Philosophy shouldn't be a difficult subject. What makes it difficult is reading the poor writing of philosophers. Anyone who reads Hegel or Heidegger winds up on the floor, clutching the rug in agony. (An example: "The nothing of Nothingness nothings..." Deep. Get me a noose.)
Hey, tautologies tautologize. Or it might just be the absence of love.
So we don't know anything
You don't know anything
I don't know anything
about love
But we are nothing
You are nothing
I am nothing
Without love
--The Death Of Ferdinand De Saussure, The Magnetic Fields
 
Comments:
Unlike the author of that "appreciation," I guess I would be embarrassed to allow anything with my name on it to be placed on a Web site called "Useless Knowledge."
 
I figured "Useless Knowledge" was intended along the lines of a zen koan. For example take the case of Joshu's Dog, AKA The Koan No, Wu (Chinese) or Mu (Japanese).
 
Post a Comment

<< Home
For when Ereignis is not sufficient.

Appropriation appropriates! Send your appropriations to enowning at gmail.com.

View mobile version