enowning
Tuesday, March 15, 2005
 
In-der-Blog-sein

Comment Me No Comments blogs on post-structuralist fundamentalism and the nattering nabobs of nihilism:
Nietzsche also grasped, though, that the modernist for whom "God is dead" is nihilistic; the same pragmatic evasion of reality that "kills" God also "kills" all distinctively human sources of meaning, all measures of value beyond personal preference (as pragmatically modified by social conformity). Heidegger discusses the "default of God" as becoming most desperate when the "default" is no longer sensed as such; when there is no longer any destitution-of to remark that of which we are destitute, our destitution has become so absolute as to erase itself entirely from our consciousness.

Nietzsche's response is to expect and announce the emergence of great souls who can 'transvalue values,' who can go beyond the negation of old systems of valuation to create their own-ultimate self-asserting selves. Heidegger's response is to attempt the destruction of the Western metaphysical tradition and the consideration of the basic questions whose 'answers' formed the now-dead systems; his intellectual descendant, Derrida, though, is the one who concerns us.

Derrida's strategy is different, though it contains elements of both Nietzsche and Heidegger. Derrida takes seriously the destruction of all Western metaphysics in Nietzsche and Heidegger, and examines the nihil (the abyss).
Nothing nihilates like destitution, so give generously to bridge the nihil.
 
Comments:
Heidegger's use of "destitution" is, of course, (not in English but the translation fools me into thinking) from his musings on a poem by Holderin, which includes the line "and what are poets for in a destitute time?" Heidegger's interest is the destitution in the "default of God," and the way the poet's being ventured forth into the abyss of that default is the re-marking of the marks of the destitution, the knowing there is a destitution-of and thus that of which to be destitute; the God whose default renders us destitute is not the God whose being never appeared. Thus it is in destitution, and not truly nihil, that we rest; and yet our destitution may come to appear as nihil when it has become so absolute as to erase the marks, when it has become unremarkable.

Thanks for the linkage!

Cheers,
PGE
 
The poets continue to call the absent gods, even in destitute times [Or so goes the cathecism--I reserve judgement on some poets]. The poet's God does not appear as a thing, but as the holy.

"To be a poet in a destitute time means: to attend, singing, to the trace of the fugitive gods. This is why the poet in the time of the world's night utters the holy."

What Are Poets For? (1946)
 
Post a Comment

<< Home
For when Ereignis is not sufficient.

Appropriation appropriates! Send your appropriations to enowning at gmail.com.

View mobile version