enowning
Sunday, July 03, 2005
 
In-der-Blog-sein

Over at Long Sunday a post on the Heidegger-Marcuse correspondence has lead to a long river of comments, moving on to the Heidegger-Carnap dispute. I was tickled by this technology assisted method of resolving arguments:
Googling it (yea tres savvage) you will perceive (that is if you subscribe to any commonly accepted standards of argument and reasoning) that Herr Carnap knocked out Heidegger rather quickly.
Rubbish says I. If you use that criteria, the winner is quite decisively in the other corner. Not that I would use that as criteria, mind you, just pointing out the truth as corresponding to the facts. It's all about how you define "perceive", I suppose.
 
Comments:
Enowning

Thank you for participating in the discussion at Long Sunday. I apologize for the bizarre direction the discussion took. I have deleted most of it because it became rather personal. But I have been reading your site for about a year and I really appreciate your thoughts.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home
For when Ereignis is not sufficient.

Appropriation appropriates! Send your appropriations to enowning at gmail.com.

View mobile version