I think we would do well to follow [Heidegger's]
example and simply drop the ontological word “being” (Sein) and
instead use the phenomenological term Anwesen, “meaningful
presence.” The next step is to work out the phenomenological
structure of meaningful presence as such, and then trace it to its
source in human finitude. By and large Heideggerians don’t get
that point. Most of them still think Heidegger’s focal topic was
“being,” even though he clearly denied that it was.

¶ 5:35 PM