This book is a major contribution to that subfield of Heidegger studies [1930s forward]. If it lacks the textual fidelity and contextual insights of the work of Theodore Kisiel, it is more philosophically, that is argumentatively, concerned.And from Richard's:
Elden follows scholars such as Theodore Kisiel in paying close attention to the development of Heidegger's thought in its context and to the unfolding nuances of his polyglot vocabulary.Heh. With that, I think I'll go read some Kisiel.