enowning
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
 
In-der-Blog-sein

Don Furnaloni reviews Colin McGrath's (Very) Critical Introduction.
McGrath sees here a “hermeneutic circularity” to Heidegger’s argumentation that allows him to overturn Heidegger’s phenomenology which “proceeds in principle, without religious and ethical presupposition”. McGrath pushes back against such prejudice by identifying terms (fallenness, guilt, conscience, temptation, etc) in Heidegger’s vocabulary that, according to McGrath, find their origin in Luther’s, Eckhart’s, and Dun Scotus’ theology. In drawing these connections from theological sources, McGrath attempts to uncover the religious ghosts that allegedly haunt Heidegger’s corpus—something that many others have already done in the field of Heidegger studies.
 
Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home
For when Ereignis is not sufficient.

Appropriation appropriates! Send your appropriations to enowning at gmail.com.

View mobile version