Wednesday, December 22, 2010
September 7, 1963, Zollikon, Heidegger unconceals.
As long as one understands being as presence as it was once understood, and is still (understood], one cannot understand technology and surely not the disclosive appropriating Event at all.
    The determination of what was designated in metaphysics as what is present [das Anwesende], the res, is [re]thought in the new interpretation of a thing (as presented in the lecture What Is a Thing?) from [the background of] the disclosive appropriating Event. In this interpretation of a thing, presence as the [metaphysical] determination of being is abandoned.
    The origin of the concept of the self is a very recent one. It is rooted in the Pietism of about 1700, when one spoke about the sinful and evil self and when the human being was thereby objectified [verdinglicht].
    A correction must be made in the section about “forgetting” in the Sicilian colloquia to the following lines: Because she is still totally with the man while departing. the purse as such is not present to her at all. Then the following should be deleted: “And therefore she allows it [the purse] to be left behind,” because she cannot leave it behind at all if it is not present.
    If I look at the woman’s behavior from outside, I look at the woman as an object moving from here to there, and I do not see her in her being-in-the-world. Going-home-to her parents is really not a going home, but a remaining-with the man.
    The ecstatic relationship (and that means the human being’s whole Da-sein) cannot be represented. As soon as I represent it, I have two objects, and I am outside the ecstatic relationship.
    Concealment is not the antithesis of consciousness but rather concealment belongs to the clearing. Freud simply did not see this clearing; otherwise, he would have succeeded in understanding the consciousness of children.

P. 182
The Zollikoner Seminare are a wonderful place for doing phenomenological finger exercises, i.e. learning to see. Providing explanations, as one is wont to do, is not seeing simply.
Post a Comment

<< Home
For when Ereignis is not sufficient.

Appropriation appropriates! Send your appropriations to enowning at gmail.com.

View mobile version

The Fourfold

Reading the
Late Heidegger

The seminar with
Andrew J. Mitchell

March 27-29, 2017
Redmond, Washington