Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Will Yong asks the ridiculous question, “what is being?” 
Attempting to frame a “theoretically transparent” answer to this question is just one way to exist in relation to it. It strikes me that the very fact that we can choose whether to engage in such a pursuit, or reject it in favour of any number of alternative pursuits, suggests to me that one is either addressing this question or not addressing it. The question itself does not go away.
Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home
For when Ereignis is not sufficient.

Appropriation appropriates! Send your appropriations to enowning at gmail.com.

View mobile version