Sunday, June 22, 2014
Berfrois talks to Simon Critchley about understanding tragedy.
Lévinas said in 1948 that the essential thing was to leave the climate of Heidegger’s philosophy, but we cannot leave it for a philosophy that would be pre-Heideggarian. That’s the trick. There’s no way back to Kant or Hegel or whatever; Heidegger is a kind of conceptual map wherein we have to move. It’s a paradigm shift in philosophy for Lévinas, but it’s a paradigm shift which did lead to these moral and political commitments, which for someone like Lévinas were disastrous. How then could one then rethink that paradigm in ways that didn’t entail those outcomes?
The way I read Lévinas is that he’s trying to give us a different vision of the ethical subject, a vision which is posited around what I call an originary authenticity. So what’s wrong with Heidegger in this sense is the emphasis upon authenticity, which is there in his reading of tragedy, in his reading of Antigone. What Heidegger picks up on is Greek, which is defined by uncanniness, and which launches out heroically into a confrontation with what he calls “the overpowering power” and does violence with the overpowering power and it results in death. Heidegger there has a heroic idea of the subject which I see someone like Lévinas undermining, in the name of a different ethical orientation.
On the one hand, Critchley asserts that "There’s no way back to Kant or Hegel or whatever". On the other, he claims "Heidegger there [in his interpretation of Sophocles' Antigone] has a heroic idea of the subject...". But there is no "subject" whatever in Heidegger's thinking, and to stick with this designation for the sake of sly convenience is only to prolong subjectivist metaphysics, just like Levinas does. What confusion these purportedly 'progressive' 'cutting-edge' thinkers of today propagate!
I'm with you. As far as I can tell, Heidegger only refers to the "subject" in the context of discussing others' work.

You're dead right. For the subject, the world, and even the Da itself (the temporal clearing), is only a Vorstellung (representation) within consciousness encapsulated in the subject.
Post a Comment

<< Home
For when Ereignis is not sufficient.

Appropriation appropriates! Send your appropriations to enowning at gmail.com.

View mobile version